| 789 | 26 | 196 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
公共体育服务的特性决定为公众提供高质量、高效率、多层次的体育服务是政府应尽的责任。伴随我国行政改革的不断深化,外包已经成为政府提供公共体育服务的有效工具,但外包只是政府将公共体育服务的生产职能转移给社会力量,不是政府责任的推卸或让渡,而是政府责任的强化。采用文献资料法对政府责任的内涵、外包的政府责任、政府履责不力的现象及原因和政府责任的实现机制进行了研究。结果显示,除了服务资金提供、服务生产协调、服务政策法规的制定等传统责任外,公共体育服务外包的政府责任还包括外包的决策、优秀接包方的遴选、完备合同的设计和外包的监管等。当前,政府在公共体育服务外包过程中存在招标不规范或违规操作、外包服务的安排与公众体育需求错位、合同设计不完善、监管不力的履责不力现象,其归因在于"官本位"思想广泛存在、法律法规体系不健全、监督力量薄弱、外包关系复杂、行政改革的方式、既得利益、缺乏外包的技能和能力。最后,通过行政问责制、整合机制、信任机制和激励机制提出促进公共体育服务外包的政府责任的实现。
Abstract:The characteristics of the public sports service have determined the government's necessary responsibilities to provide high-quality,high effec-tive and multiple services to the public. With the constant deepening of administrative reform in China,outsourcing has become an effective tool for the publicsports service. However,outsourcing is only a form to transfer the government's production function in public sports service to non-government sectors,which is a form to strengthen the responsibility of government,not to shirk or demise the responsibility. Through documents,this paper will make a researchon connotation of government responsibilities,government responsibilities in outsourcing,the phenomenon and reasons of poor implementation,and the real-ization of government's responsibilities. The results of the investigation shows that,apart from some traditional responsibilities like fund providing,serviceproduction coordinating,and policymaking,the responsibilities of government for public sports service outsourcing included decision-making,excellent out-sourcing supplier selecting,outsourcing contract designing,and outsourcing supervision etc. At present,there are still some problems in current public sportsservice outsourcing,such as irregularities in biding or illegal operations,the mismatching between outsourcing arrangements and public sports demand,faulty design of contract,ineffective supervision and so on. All these phenomena result mainly from the extensive thoughts of"Mandarinate",the imperfect le-gal system,the ineffective supervision,the complex interpersonal relationships,the way of administrative reform,vested interests,and lack of skills and abil-ities of outsourcing. In order to realize the government responsibility in the process of public sports service outsourcing,some solutions should be takenthrough the administrative accountability,the mechanism of integration,trust and incentive.
[1]沈开举,王钰.行政责任研究[M].郑州:郑州大学出版社,2004:7.
[2]李海青.公民、权利与正义政治哲学基本范畴研究[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2011:173.
[3]格罗弗·斯塔林.公共部门管理[M].陈宪,译.上海:上海译文出版社,2003:145.
[4]张国庆.行政管理学概论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2000:486.
[5]张成福.责任政府论[J].中国人民大学学报,2000(2):75-82.
[6]SELDEN B,LELIS B H.The Practice of America Public Policy Making[M].New York:M.E.Sharpe,Inc,2007:296.
[7]吕志奎.政府合同治理的风险分析:委托-代理理论视角[J].武汉大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2008(5):676-680.
[8]唐纳德·凯特尔.权力共享:公共治理与私人市场[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2009:5.
[9]刘子溪.江西网友反映某体育工程招标涉嫌暗箱操作获官方回应[EB\OL].http://jx.people.com.cn/n/2014/0627/c186330-21524190.html.
[10]罗之飏,陈岩,钱晞.购买体育场馆服务莫与市民需求错位[N].四川日报,2014-08-15(10).
[11]胡科,虞重干.政府购买体育服务的个案考察与思考:以长沙市政府购买游泳服务为个案[J].武汉体育学院学报,2012,46(1):43-51.
[12]李震,陈元欣,刘倩.政府购买公共体育服务研究:以武汉市政府购买游泳服务为个案[J].武汉体育学院学报,2014,48(7):36-40.
[13]张小劲,于小虹.推进国家治理体系和治理能力的现代化——六讲[M].北京:人民出版社,2014:6.
[14]高小萍《.政府采购法》与《招标投标法》、《合同法》的衔接问题研究[J].中国政府采购,2010,4:78-80.
[15]林鹏举.哈尔滨商业大学第三届研究生学术论坛文萃[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2007:176-178.
[16]周益扬.反腐败研究[M].第9集.杭州:浙江大学出版社,2010:448
[17]周亚越.行政问责制的内涵及其意义[J].理论与改革,2004(4):41-43.
[18]贺小刚.论信任、资源与持续竞争优势[J].外国经济与管理,2002(8):9-15.
[19]陈建华,马士华.基于工期协调的项目公司与承包商收益激励模型[J].中国管理科学,2007,03:114-122.
[20]宋素娟.管理技能训练[M].南京:南京大学出版社,2013:167.
[21]苏东水.管理心理学[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,1998:97.
[22]曾小春.电子商务管理[M].西安:西安交通大学出版社,2010:144.
[23]殷昭举.创新社会治理机制[M].广州:广东人民出版社,2011:19.
基本信息:
DOI:10.13297/j.cnki.issn1005-0000.2014.05.007
中图分类号:G80-05
引用信息:
[1]陈斌,韩会君.公共体育服务外包的政府责任及实现机制论析[J].天津体育学院学报,2014,29(05):404-408+438.DOI:10.13297/j.cnki.issn1005-0000.2014.05.007.
基金信息:
上海市地方高校大文科研究生学术新人培育计划项目(项目编号:xsxr2013011)