| 423 | 13 | 160 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
立法立场的法源观和司法立场的法源观本质上是一种国家法源观,这种法源观已经不能有效地回应法律实践的需要,因此,需走出国家法源观,从形式性认知向功能性认知转变,把法律渊源理解为"有说服性论据"更能解释社会现实。在一些司法案例中,法院之所以把中国足协的行业自治规范用作裁判规范,因为这些自治规范能为法院的判决提供"有说服力论据",而这种说服力建立在足协行业规范的专业理性和秩序正义基础之上。从法理上看,中国足协的行业管理制定权中有法律授权属性,给这种制定权加入了"公权"属性,增加了中国足协行业自治规范"法律硬度",进而在公信力方面为行政执法和法律适用提供更有"说服性"的法源论据,故中国足协行业规范应在中国法律渊源体系中应占有一席之地。不同的法源类别意味着其在法律渊源适用中的地位与作用不同,同时也会对法律适用者产生不同的优位排序思维。在中国语境中,应把足协行业自治规范归于非正式法源类别为宜,由此也决定了其在法律渊源体系中的辅助性功用和次层级地位,它对于法院的法源论证只具说服性效力。在中国足协行业自治规范与其他法源之间的识别问题上,应把正式法源优位地位思维与行业自治规范等非正式法源的辅助性功用统一于语境化运用中。
Abstract：The legal status of legislation is the same with that of justice, which is state legal status. This legal status cannot effectively respond to the needs of the legal practice. So, going through state legal status and turning from formal cognition to functional cognition, understanding legal origin to convincing argument, prefer to explain social truth. In some judicial cases, courts used the Chinese football association industry autonomy specification as the referee specification, because these autonomous specification can offer"convincing evidence"for the court's decision, and this kind of persuasive specification based on professional rational justice and order basis. From legal point of view, the Chinese football association industry management have legally authorized at-tribute, which give this right to join the"public power"attribute, which increased the Chinese football association industry autonomy standard"law hardness",and the applicable law for administrative law enforcement in terms of credibility and provide more "persuasive"source argument. So, the Chinese football association industry specifications have a place in Chinese legal origin. Different legal origin means different status and function in applying, which, at the same time, make the law applier have different thought of sequence. In Chinese statement, football industry standard should attribute to informal legal origin,which decide its subsidiary function and secondary status in legal origin and only have convincing efficacy in court legal origin argument. Between the Chinese football association industry specifications and other legal status source identification problem, the formal legal source optimal position thinking and formal source industry self-government norms such as informal source of auxiliary function should be unity in contextual application.
[1]黎军.基于法治的自治:行业自治规范的实证研究[J].法商研究,2006(4):47.
[2]中国足球协会.中国足球协会章程[S].2003.
[3]黎军.论司法对行业自治的介入[J].中国法学,2006(4):69-78.
[4]屠世超.行业自治规范的法律效力及其效力审查机制[J].政治与法律,2009(3):65-74.
[5]彭中礼.当代中国法律渊源理论研究重述[M].济南:山东人民出版社,2011.
[6]陈金钊.法律渊源:司法视角的定位[J].甘肃政法学院学报,2009(6):2.
[7]任莹英,李秀群.法律渊源的方法论意义[J].济南:山东人民出版社,2006.
[8]GRAY.The Nature and Sources of the Law[M].2d ed.New York:Quid Pro LLC,1921.
[9]博登海默.法理学:法律哲学与法律方法[M].邓正来,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2004.
[10]魏德士.法理学[M].丁小春,吴越,译.北京:法律出版社,2005.
[11]应松年,何海波.我国行政法的渊源:反思与重述[M].北京:商务印书馆,2004.
[12]刘旺洪.行政法学[M].南京:南京师范大学出版社,2005.
[13]刘连泰.行政法与行政诉讼法[M].厦门:厦门大学出版社,2011.
[14]姜明安.行政法与行政诉讼法[M].第五版.北京:北京大学出版社,高等教育出版社,2011.
[15]何海波.行政法的渊源[M].北京:中国方正出版社,2005.
[16]黎军.基于法治的自治:行业自治规范的实证研究[J].法商研究,2006(4):47.
[17]周佑勇.论作为行政法之法源的行政惯例[J].政治与法律,2010(6):15.
[18]广西壮族自治区南宁市中级人民法院[R].南市终经字第339号,2001.
[19]张静.法团主义[M].第三版.上海:东方出版社,2015.
[20]黎军.行业组织的行政法问题研[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2002.
[21]奥托·迈耶.德国行政法[M].刘飞,译.北京:商务印书馆,2004.
[22]黄异.行政法总论[M].台湾:三民书局,1992.
[23]舒国滢.法理学导论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2006.
[24]张骐.试论指导性案例的“指导性”[J].法制与社会发展,2007(6):45.
[25]高军东.法制视角下的中国足协及其《纪律准则及处罚办法》[J].天津体育学院学报,2011(2):145-148.
[26]H·帕特里克·格伦.有说服力的论据[J].牟西,译.环球法律评论,1998(2):15-16.
[27]高艳丽,唐文兵.我国职业足球联赛赛场秩序存在的问题与规范措施[J].上海体育学院学报,2005(3):17-21.
[28]鲁篱.行业协会经济自治权研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2003.
基本信息:
DOI：10.13297/j.cnki.issn1005-0000.2015.03.009
中图分类号:G80-05
引用信息:
[1]韦志明.论中国足协行业规范的法源地位[J].天津体育学院学报,2015,30(03):228-233.DOI:10.13297/j.cnki.issn1005-0000.2015.03.009.
基金信息:
中国博士后科学基金第56批面上资助项目(项目编号:2014M561278)
2015-05-25
2015-05-25