天津体育学院学报

CAS是当今世界上解决国际体育纠纷最权威的仲裁机构,它通过设立普通仲裁庭、上诉仲裁庭和临时仲裁庭来解决产生于体育领域的争议。目前,上诉仲裁程序已经成为近年来使用最广泛的程序。运用文献分析和逻辑分析的方法,介绍了苏亚雷斯纪律纠纷处罚案的起源及纠纷解决过程,分析、评介了CAS对苏亚雷斯纪律处罚上诉纠纷仲裁案涉及的3个争议焦点问题,即作为案外第三人的俱乐部是否享有上诉主体资格、对球员处罚是否存在规则适用的错误,以及该纪律处罚是否符合错罚相当原则。研究发现,CAS确定了作为案外第三人的巴塞罗那俱乐部的上诉主体资格,这一仲裁实践完善了FIFA纪律处罚案件中上诉人的主体范围,维护了当事人上诉的平等权;厘清了FIFA纪律准则第48条与第57条之间的相互关系,确认FIFA纪律准则第48条相对于第57条而言构成特别法,而第57条则属于一般法,通过这一仲裁实践,CAS纠正了体育组织内部裁决的规则适用错误,促进体育组织规则得以完善;通过确认FIFA纪律处罚措施的有效性,表明CAS在作出裁决时充分尊重体育组织的自治权,但仍需继续发挥监督、制约职能,并及时提出建议以完善体育组织的规章,从而促进仲裁裁决的客观、公正,保护当事人的正当权益。

Nowadays,CAS is the most authoritative international sports dispute resolution arbitration institution in the world,by setting up common arbitrationtribunal,appeal tribunal and temporary arbitration tribunal to resolve disputes produced in sports field. At present,the appeal procedure has become the mostwidely used procedure in recent years. By using the methods of literature analysis and logical analysis,this paper introduces the origin and dispute resolutionprocess of Suarez disciplinary punishment case,and analyzed three controversial issues that CAS arbitration tribunal has to consider of which involving three as-pects that refer to whether the BC club,as the third person outside the case,has subject qualification to appeal,and to whether there are errors when rules are ap-plied,and to whether the disciplinary actions are in line with the principle of punishment. CAS assures the Barcelona club's subject qualification to appeal as athird person. Through this practice the scope of the main body of the appellant of FIFA disciplinary procedure has been identified,which maintains the equalrights of the parties to appeal;By clarifying the relationship between the article 48 and the article 57 of FIFA disciplinary code,it confirms that,compared to thearticle 57 of the FIFA disciplinary code,the article 48 is a special article,and article 57 belongs to the general article. CAS corrects errors when internal rules ofsports organizations are applied,which promotes the sports organization's rules;Through confirming the validity of the FIFA disciplinary punishment,it indi-cates that the CAS fully respects the autonomy of sports organization when making appellant decisions,but it still needs to continue to play an important part ofsupervision and restriction,and to put forward suggestions in a timely manner so as to perfect the regulations of sports organizations,thereby promoting the arbi-tration ruling to be more objective and fair,and protecting the legitimate rights and interests of the parties.