| 1,098 | 22 | 192 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
情绪与决策的关系是当前心理学研究的热点之一,近期研究者开始从情绪的动机维度模型出发重新探讨情绪对认知活动的影响。以羽毛球项目中后场击球决策为研究载体,运用具身化的情绪诱发方式,通过3个试验研究探讨趋近性积极情绪对运动决策的影响,并考察执行功能这一认知活动中枢在积极情绪与运动决策关系中的作用。试验一通过具身化的情绪诱发方式探究不同趋近性积极情绪对2类决策的影响,发现低趋近性积极情绪状态下被试的决策正确率更高,且主要表现在认知决策层面。试验二在试验一的基础上进行改进并加入抑制功能的分组,发现抑制功能较好的被试可以降低高趋近积极情绪造成的不利影响。为了验证前述结果的可靠性,试验三利用双任务范式占用个体的抑制资源后让个体在不同趋近性积极情绪条件下进行认知决策,发现当抑制功能被占用时,高趋近积极情绪对决策表现的不利影响再次显现出来。结合3个试验可以发现,趋近性积极情绪类型对认知决策正确率影响显著,低趋近积极情绪相比于高趋近积极情绪更有利于决策者进行准确的决策,且抑制功能在趋近性积极情绪对认知决策影响中具有调节作用,即高抑制功能可以降低高趋近积极情绪对个体决策的不利影响。
Abstract：The relationship between emotion and decision-making is the research hotspot in psychology. Researchers began to re-explore the effects of emo-tion on cognition based on the motivational dimensional model of affect. Using the embodied method to evoke emotions,the present study tried to investigatethe influence of approach-motivated positive on decision-making of badminton back court shot via 3 experiments in which executive function was included.Experiment 1 explored the influence of approach-motivated positive on two kind of decision-making by evoking embodied emotion,the results showed that ap-proach-motivated positive affect had a significant effect on decision-making,especially on cognitive decision making. Participants' decision making perfor-mance decreased with the rise of approaching motivation. Experiment 2 was improved on the basis of Experiment 1 and the grouping of inhibition was added,the results indicated that participants with better inhibition function tended to reduce the negative effects of high approach-motivated positive affect. In orderto verify the reliability of the above results,experiment 3 used the dual-task paradigm to occupy the individual's inhibitory resources and let the individualsmake cognitive decisions under various conditions. And it was found that the negative effects of high approach-motivated positive on decision-making wereshown again when inhibition was taken up. In combination with the 3 experiments,we found that approach-motivated positive affect had a significant effect oncognitive decision-making which is moderated by inhibition function. Participants' decision making performance decreased with the rise of approaching moti-vation. And those who had better inhibition function had the ability to reduce adverse effects of high approach-motivated positive on decision-making in sport.
[1]SINGER R N.Motor learning and human performance[M].New York:Macmillan,2010.
[2]王斌.运动直觉决策测评的可能性[J].北京体育大学学报,2004,27(8):1043-1045.
[3]JACKSON R C,WARREN S,ABERNETHY B.Anticipation skill and susceptibility to deceptive movement[J].Acta Psychologica,2006,123(3):355-371.
[4]张怡,周成林.网球运动员技术动作预判能力的视觉信息加工策略研究[J].天津体育学院学报,2014,29(6):467-472.
[5]张素婷.情绪对优秀排球运动员预判的影响:执行功能的调节作用[D].北京:北京体育大学,2016.
[6]NEIL R,BAYSTON P,HANTON S,et al.The influence of stress and emotions on association football referee decision-making[J].Sport&Exercise Psychology Review,2013(2):22-41.
[7]叶浣钰.情绪与工作记忆对羽毛球运动员决策的影响[D].北京:北京体育大学,2012.
[8]董哲.执行功能对羽毛球回球决策的影响[D].北京:北京体育大学,2016.
[9]曹立智.执行功能对排球运动员拦网决策的影响[D].北京:北京体育大学,2016.
[10]付颖颖,迟立忠.情绪调节策略对篮球运动员决策的影响:工作记忆容量的调节作用[J].北京体育大学学报,2016(4):72-79.
[11]RUSSELL J A.Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion[J].Psychological Review,2003,110(1):145.
[12]FREDRICKSON B L.The role of positive emotions in positive psychology:The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions[J].American Psychologist,2001,56:218-226.
[13]GABLE P A,HARMON-JONES E.Late positive potential to appetitive stimuli and local attentional bias[J].Emotion,2010,10(3):441-446.
[14]GABLE P A,HARMON-JONES E.Approach-motivated positive affect reduces breadth of attention[J].Psychological Science,2008a,19:476-482.
[15]GABLE P A,HARMON-JONES E.The blues broaden,but the nasty narrows attentional consequences of negative affects low and high in motivational intensity[J].Psychological Science,2010b,21(2):211-215.
[16]GABLE P A,HARMON-JONES E.The effect of low versus high approach-motivated positive affect on memory for peripherally versus centrally presented information[J].Emotion,2010c,10(4):599-603.
[17]HARMON-JONES E,GABLE P A.The effect of commitment on relative left frontal cortical activity:tests of the action-based model of dissonance[J].Personality&Social Psychology Bulletin,2011,37(3):395-408.
[18]迟立忠,周湘文,戴劲.情绪变化对羽毛球运动员决策速度准确性的影响[J].北京体育大学学报,2012(1):65-68.
[19]王春梅,吕勇.情绪的动机性对认知加工作用研究评述[J].心理研究,2016,9(1):15-21.
[20]LANG P J,BRADLEY M M,CUTHBERT B N.International Affective Picture System(IAPS):Affective Ratings of Pictures and Instruction Manual(Technical Report A-8)[M].Gainesville:The Center for Research in Psychophysiology,University of Florida,2008.
[21]李金霞.不同动机趋近积极情绪对注意范围的影响[D].西安:陕西师范大学,2012.
[22]刘亚,王振宏,孔风.情绪具身观:情绪研究的新视角[J].心理科学进展,2011,19(1):50-59.
[23]PRICE T F,HARMON-JONES E.The effect of embodied emotive states on cognitive categorization.[J].Emotion,2010,10(6):934-938.
[24]MISSIER F D,M?NTYL?T,BRUIN W B D.Decision-making Competence,Executive Functioning,and General Cognitive Abilities[J].Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,2012,25(4):331-351.
[25]SCHIEBENER J,WEGMANN E,PAWLIKOWSKI M,et al.Supporting decisions under risk:Explicit advice differentially affects people according to their working memory performance and executive functioning[J].Neuroscience of Decision Making,2013,1(Jan):9-18.
[26]SCHIEBENER J,WEGMANN E,GATHMANN B,et al.Among three different executive functions,general executive control ability is a key predictor of decision making under objective risk[J].Frontiers in Psychology,2014,5(2):1386.
[27]董蕊,张力为,彭凯平,等.自我损耗研究方法述评[J].心理科学,2013(4):994-997.
[28]吴彦文,游旭群,李海霞.注意力资源限制与双任务的相互干扰机制[J].心理学报,2014,46(2):174-184.
[29]FABIO DEL MISSIER,TIMO M?NTYL?,W?NDI BRUINE DE BRUIN.Executive functions in decision making:An individual differences approach[J].Thinking&Reasoning,2010,16(2):69-97.
[30]谭川.优秀羽毛球男子单打运动员技战术运用特点的对比分析[D].成都:成都体育学院,2015.
[31]DIAMOND A,LEE K.Interventions shown to aid executive function development in children 4 to 12 years old[J].Science,2011,333(6045):959.
[32]伍秋萍,冯聪,陈斌斌.具身框架下的社会认知研究述评[J].心理科学进展,2011,19(3):336-345.
[33]HARMON-JONES E,PETERSON C K.Supine body position reduces neural response to anger evocation[J].Psychological Science,2009,20(10):1209-1210.
[34]DUNNING J P,HAJCAK G.See no evil:Directing visual attention within unpleasant images modulates the electrocortical response[J].Psychophysiology,2009,46(1):28-33.
基本信息:
DOI：10.13297/j.cnki.issn1005-0000.2017.02.008
中图分类号:G847
引用信息:
[1]李权华,迟立忠.趋近性积极情绪对羽毛球运动员击球决策的影响——抑制功能的调节作用[J].天津体育学院学报,2017,32(02):139-145.DOI:10.13297/j.cnki.issn1005-0000.2017.02.008.
基金信息:
中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金资助项目(项目编号:2017sys007)