| 420 | 15 | 98 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
目的:借助返回抑制范式,通过试验研究跆拳道运动员返回抑制的时程特征,进而从理论上对返回抑制的发生机制及其跨情景和跨人群的稳定性进行探讨,并试图为返回抑制与实践结合提供可靠支持。方法:试验一,采用4因素混合试验设计,通过改进返回抑制的基本范式,增加跆拳道背景,探讨跆拳道运动员返回抑制的时程特点,以挖掘返回抑制的机制,为跆拳道腿法组合的改进提供理论支持;试验二,在试验一基础上采用3因素混合试验设计,通过变换4个时间间隔(时程),分析跆拳道运动员与普通大学生在返回抑制上出现差异的原因。结合2个试验结果,还可以探讨返回抑制发生的稳定性。结果:线索和人群的主效应均显著且两者之间交互作用显著,跆拳道运动员反应时显著短于普通大学生,且仅分析跆拳道运动员数据时未出现返回抑制,线索与抑制机制交互作用显著;线索和时间间隔的主效应均显著,跆拳道运动员和普通大学生均出现返回抑制,在时间间隔为300 ms时反应时最长,900 ms时反应时最短。结论:返回抑制的发生机制既基于客体又基于位置,且具有跨情景和部分跨人群稳定性。跆拳道运动员在实战时应避免2次出腿的时间间隔为900 ms,且2次出腿最好击打同侧。
Abstract:Objective: This thesis aimed to discuss the duration characteristics of inhibition of return of taekwondo athletes by adopting the paradigm ofinhibition of return so as to study its mechanism, find whether it had the consistency cross situations and people and try to provide reliable support forthe combining between the theory of inhibition of return and practice. Method: In Experiment 1, we used 4-factor mixed design to discuss the durationcharacteristics of inhibition of return of taekwondo athletes by employing the basic paradigm of inhibition of return combined with taekwondo background.All these were conducted to studying the mechanism of inhibition of return and providing theoretical support for advancing taekwondo Combination. InExperiment 2, based on experiment 1, the 3-factors mixed design was employed to analyze the reasons causing differences between taekwondo athletesand ordinary undergraduates in inhibition of return by varying SOA. Through combining the results of the two experiments above, the author alsodiscussed the constancy of inhibition of return. Results: The main effects of cue and crowd and their interaction should be significant. The response timeof taekwondo athletes was obviously shorter than that of common undergraduates, and inhibition of return was not found in taekwondo athletes. Theinteraction between cue and mechanism of inhibition was significant. Experiment 2 suggested that the main effects of cue and crowd should beprominent, and the Inhibition of return was found in both taekwondo athletes and ordinary undergraduates. The longest response time was found whenSOA is 300 ms, and the shortest one appeared when SOA is 900 ms. Conclusions: The results indicated that the mechanism of inhibition of return wasbased both on objectives and locations, and it had cross-situational and partially cross-people consistency. The taekwondo athletes should avoid kickingwith 900 ms of SOA and they had better hit the same side in the actual combat.
[1]POSNER M I.Orienting of attention[J].Quarterly.Journal of Experimental Psychology,1980,32(3):3-15.
[2]POSNER M I,COHEN Y.Components of visual orienting[M].NJ:Erlbaum,1984:531-536.
[3]ATKINSON M A,SIMPSON A,SKARRATT P A.Is social inhibition of return due to action co-representation[J].Acta Psychologica,2014,150:85-93.
[4]DODD M D,CASTEL A D,PRATT J.Inhibition of return with rapid serial shifts of attention:implications for memory and visual search[J].Perception&Psychophysics,2003,65(7):1126-1135.
[5]KLEIN R M,CHRISTIE J,MORRIS E P.Vector averaging of inhibition of return[J].Psychonomic Bulletin&Review,2005,12(2):295-300.
[6]PRATT J,HIRSHHORN M.Examining the time course of facilitation and inhibition with simultaneous onset and offset cues[J].Psychological Research,2003,67(4):261-265.
[7]张明,刘宁.视觉返回抑制的实验范式[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(3):385-393.
[8]SKARRATT P A,COLE G G,KINGSTONE A.Social inhibition of return[J].Acta Psychologica,2010,134(1):48-54.
[9]COLE G G,KUHN G.What the experimenter’s prime tells the observer’s brain[J].Attention,Perception,&Psychophysics,2010,72(5):1367-1376.
[10]HOMMEL B.Action control according to TEC(theory of event coding)[J].Psychological Research,2009,73(4):512-526.
[11]TAS A C,DODD M D,HOLLINGWORTH A.The role of surface feature continuity in object-based inhibition of return[J].Mind&Language,2012,20(1):29-47.
[12]SAMUEL A G,DONNA KAT.Inhibition of return:A graphical metaanalysis of its time course and an empirical test of its temporal and spatial properties[J].Psychonomic Bulletin&Review,2003,10(4):897-906.
[13]李军.分心作业对环境主导注意型运动员返回抑制的影响[J].天津体育学院学报,2011,26(3):264-267.
[14]丁振宾,周文福.乒乓球运动员孔家注意返回抑制特征的研究[J].沈阳体育学院学报,2014,33(4):122-126.
[15]欧岳山,杨清,李艳翎.篮球、蹦床运动员在辨别任务中返回抑制时程特征[J].体育学刊,2010,17(1):70-74.
[16]田麦久.运动训练学[M].2版.北京:人民体育出版社,2000.
[17]方伟.跆拳道技战术发展趋势研究[D].北京:北京体育大学,2011.
[18]谢云.中国优秀女子跆拳道运动员技战术特征研究[D].北京:北京体育大学,2004.
[19]侯盛明,党旗.使用电子护具后我国跆拳道运动员得分技战术特征分析[J].中国体育教练员,2010(3):50-60.
[20]蒋成忠.竞技跆拳道优秀运动员吴静钰、侯玉琢技战术对比研究[D].武汉:武汉体育学院,2014.
[21]SATEL J,WANG Z,TRAPPENBERG T P,et al.Modeling inhibition of return as short-term depression of early sensory input to the superior colliculus[J].Vis Res,2011,51(9):987-996.
[22]王瑞元.运动生理学[M].北京:人民体育出版社,2000:24-27.
[23]WANG Z,SATE l J,KLEIN R M.Sensory and motor mechanisms of oculomotor inhibition of return[J].Exp Brain Res,2012,218(3):441-453.
基本信息:
DOI:10.13297/j.cnki.issn1005-0000.2015.06.013
中图分类号:G886.9;G804.8
引用信息:
[1]王新宇,范静,王浩平,等.基于跆拳道运动员时程特征的返回抑制机制研究[J].天津体育学院学报,2015,30(06):538-543.DOI:10.13297/j.cnki.issn1005-0000.2015.06.013.
基金信息:
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助课题(项目编号:2014YB014);; 北京体育大学院系研究所课题(项目编号:2015ZX013、2015ZX012)
2015-11-25
2015-11-25