| 987 | 16 | 354 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
在反思已有研究不足的基础上,旨在通过对电竞合法性分析,为电竞可持续发展提供理论向导。电竞合法性的2个序阶:在语义学上要实现"名副其实",在语用学上要实现"名正言顺"。当下电竞合法性辩护存在的问题:仅实现了在语义学上的逻辑自洽或理论圆融,缺乏逻辑与历史统一、理论与现实统一的分析;从应然性角度讲,电竞符合体育之规定,即具身性、科学性、自主性和伦理性,具有应然层面上的合法性;从实然性角度讲,在技术使用边界、技术规训、自我技术等方面具有不确定性,容易引发伦理风险。可见,电竞实践活动需要与日常生活中的道德文法结构相匹配,发展电竞要"合天道",体现自然正当性;发展电竞要"合情理",与民众生活观念相容,体现公众的普遍可期待性;发展电竞要"合法律",法律是电竞产业运营的底线。建议,由于电竞主要面向未成年人,因技术不成熟而具有伦理风险,对此我们需要保持警惕。
Abstract:On the basis of reviewing the existing research,this paper tries to defend the legality of e-sports,in order to provide theoretical guidance for the sustainable development of e-sports industry. There are two orders of the legitimacy of e-sports:in semantics,it should be "worthy of the name",and in pragmatics,it should be "justified";The existing problems in the legal defense of e-sports:it only realizes the logical self-consistency or theoretical convergence in semantics,but lacks the unification of logic and history,theory and reality at the level of pragmatics;From the perspective of ought to be:e-sports has legitimate of ought to be:embodied,scientific,independent and ethical;From the practical level,there is uncertainty in the use boundary of technology,self-technical discipline and other aspects,which may easily lead to ethical risks. Research conclusion:the development of e-sports should be in harmony with heaven and reflect the natural legitimacy;the development of e-sports should be reasonable,should be compatible with the concept of public life,to meet the general expectations of the public;the development of e-sports should comply with the law,and the law is the bottom line of industrial operation. Finally,Suggestions are put forward:e-sports is mainly aimed at young people.Due to the immature technology,it has ethical risks,and we need to treat it with caution.
[1]刘承韪.娱乐法的规范意蕴与体系构建[J].政法论坛,2019,37(4):156-166.
[2]林远泽.儒家后习俗责任伦理学的理念[M].台北:联经出版公司,2016:326-337.
[3]PARRY J.E-sports Are Not Sports[J].Sport,Ethics and Philosophy,2019,13(1):3-18
[4]ABANAZIR C.Institutionalisation in E-Sports[J].Sport,Ethics and Philosophy,2018:1-15.
[5]杨其虎,刘湘溶.传承抑或僭越:电子体育对现代体育的影响[J].成都体育学院学报,2014,40(9):24-29.
[6]董新风.电子竞技的体育性分析[J].体育文化导刊,2013(9):154-156.
[7]王若光,孙庆祝.纯化体育:对我国体育运动项目管理的批判与梳理[J].武汉体育学院学报,2007,41(10):6-9.
[8]高强,康义萌.从“形而上学式”到“历史主义式”体育哲学:始于体育概念无穷性困境思考[J].体育科学,2018,38(1):63
[9]金轲,王昕.大力发展文化产业的产业政策研究:以电竞产业为例[J].经济研究参考,2017,56:58-64.
[10]姜中介,阿细.电子竞技“资本论”[J].21世纪商业评论,2014(16):42-45.
[11]郭赟程,鲁长芬.推动电子竞技运动在大学体育训练中的应用[J].中国高等教育,2018(23):53-55.
[12]易剑东.中国电子竞技十大问题辨识[J].体育学研究,2018,1(4):31-50.
[13]路云亭.从颠覆到再造:电子竞技在中国的存在维度[J].体育学研究,2018,1(4):51-57.
[14]CLAUDIA P.Philosophy of Sport in Germany:An Overview of Its History and Academic Research[J].Journal of the Philosophy of Sport,2010,37(2):271-291.
[15]LOPEZ FRIAS F J,Monfort X G.A Hermeneutical Analysis of the Internalist Approach in the Philosophy of Sport[J].Physical Culture and Sport.Studies and Research,2015,67(1):5-12.
[16]伯丽纳德.舒茨.蚱蜢:游戏,生命与乌托邦[M].胡天枚,周育萍,译.台北:心灵工坊文化,2016:9
[17]LOPEZ FRIAS F J,GIMENO MONFORT X.The hermeneutics of sport:limits and conditions of possibility of our understandings of sport[J].Sport,Ethics and Philosophy,2016:1-17.
[18]安若澜.亚里士多德的《形而上学》[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2015:19
[19]郭红卫.Sport考论[J].体育科学,2009,29(5):83-97.
[20]曾令辉.虚拟社会人的发展研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2009:
[21]蓝江.数码身体、拟-生命与游戏生态学:游戏中的玩家-角色辩证法[J].探索与争鸣,2019(4):75-83+158.
[22]姜宇辉.“玩是谦恭,不是解放”--作为控制、反制与自制的电子游戏[J].探索与争鸣,2019(4):84-91+159.
[23]叶敬忠.游戏将把留守儿童带往何方[N].中国青年报,2019-01-07(006).
[24]马丁·海德格尔.海德格尔选集(上册)[M].孙周兴,译.上海:上海三联出版社,1996:933
[25]陈炎.文化的谱系[J].社会科学辑刊,2010(4):53-57.
[26]米歇尔·福柯.规训与惩罚[M].刘北成,杨远婴,译.上海:上海三联出版社,2014:17
[27]杨大春.反思的现代性与技术理性的解构:海德格尔和福柯论现代技术问题[J].自然辩证法研究,2003,19(2):48-53.
[28]郭道晖.法的时代呼唤[M].北京:中国法制出版社,1998:164
[29]张明皓,叶敬忠.游戏商品化中的留守儿童[J].探索与争鸣,2019(4):92-99+159.
基本信息:
DOI:10.13297/j.cnki.issn1005-0000.2020.01.014
中图分类号:G899
引用信息:
[1]徐正旭,何平香,龚正伟.法哲学视角下电子竞技合法性研究[J].天津体育学院学报,2020,35(01):88-94.DOI:10.13297/j.cnki.issn1005-0000.2020.01.014.
基金信息:
国家社会科学基金项目(项目编号:19BTY002)
2020-01-16
2020-01-16
2020-01-16