| 2,052 | 79 | 219 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
脱钩后全国性单项体育协会的外部关系得以理顺,协会内部治理的完善是其进一步发展的首要障碍,也是协会价值功能实现的前提。通过文献资料、案例实证的研究方法,梳理全国性单项体育协会的脱钩进展,以中国足协内部治理为样本进行实证考察,分析协会内部治理结构与机制面临的困境,最后提出一些完善建议。考察发现,中国足协内部治理结构相比普通社会团体,更符合体育行业治理需要,现已形成了会员大会、执委会、主席办公会、秘书处、司法部门为主的治理结构,以及包括决策、财务、人事、监督、仲裁的治理机制。然而,足协的内部治理仍面临如下困境:协会外部合法性危机,治理部门间权限模糊,协会章程约束力不足,仲裁机制法治化不足,人事机制偏离自治,会员制度存在局限性。因此,应完善单项协会内部治理的相关法律体系,完善适合体育行业管理的法人治理结构,完善单项协会的内部治理机制。
Abstract:After the separation,the external relationship of national single sport association had been clarified. The improvement of internal governance in associations was the primary obstacle to their further development and the premise of value and function realization. Literature study and case empirical analysis were adopted to sort out the separation progress of national single sport associations,and to analyze the dilemma of association's internal governance structure and mechanism,based on the sample of internal governance in CFA,lastly put forward some suggestions for improvement. The research showed that internal governance structure of CFA was more appropriate for sports governance needs than normal social organizations. CFA has formed a governing structure consisting mainly of general assembly,executive committee,chairman's office,secretariat and judicial department,as well as a governing mechanism including policymaking,finance,personnel,supervision and arbitration. However,the legitimacy crisis outside the association,the ambiguous authority of the governing department,the ineffective charter,the low-legalized arbitration mechanism,the non-autonomous personnel mechanism and the limited membership system were the problems in CFA's internal governance. Hence,we should improve the relevant legal system of internal governance of single associations,perfect the corporate governance structure suitable for the management of sports industry,and improve the internal governance mechanism of single associations.
[1]史康成.全国性体育社团从“同构”到“脱钩”改革的路径选择[J].北京体育大学学报,2013,36(12):1-5.
[2]罗思婧.我国体育行业自治及其法律规制重构[J].北京体育大学学报,2017,40(3):16-21+32.
[3]韦志明.论中国足协行业规范的法源地位[J].天津体育学院学报,2015,30(3):228-233.
[4]张春良.体育协会内部治理的法治度评估--以中国足协争端解决机制为样本的实证考察[J].体育科学,2015,35(7):18-26+57.
[5]中国足球协会.中国足球协会介绍[EB/OL].http://www.thecfa.cn/gyzx/index.html.
[6]戴红磊.中国体育社会组织治理研究[D].大连:大连理工大学,2016.
[7]归建华.上海行业协会内部治理研究:非营利组织的视角[D].上海:上海交通大学,2009.
[8]倪咸林.行业协会商会脱钩后完善内部治理研究[J].行政管理改革,2016(10):41-45.
[9]胡佳澍.政社分离视域下政府对中国足球协会的嵌入性治理[J].沈阳体育学院学报,201 7,36(4):1-5,11.
[10]蔡立东,王宇飞.职能主义法人分类模式批判--兼论我国民法典法人制度设计的支架[J].社会科学战线,2011(9):180-186.
[11]王家宏,蔡朋龙.国家治理视阈下全国性单项运动协会改革与发展的现实审视与推进策略[J].成都体育学院学报,2018,44(6):9-17.
[12]谢鸿飞.《民法总则》法人分类的层次与标准[J].交大法学,2016(4):42-45.
[13]易剑东,施秋波.论完善中国足球法人治理结构的关键问题--写在《中国足球改革总体方案》颁布一周年[J].体育学刊,2016,23(3):1-8.
[14]黎军,李海平.行业协会法人治理机制研究[J].中国非营利评论,2009,4(1):40-61,250.
[15]肖鹏.体育社会组织的法人地位研究[J].成都体育学院学报,2018,44(5):41-46.
[16]叶强.修改《中华人民共和国体育法》“体育社会团体”一章的思考[J].天津体育学院学报,2011,26(4):327-331,335.
[17]中共中央办公厅,国务院办公厅.行业协会商会与行政机关脱钩总体方案[Z].2015-07-08.
[18]甫玉龙,史晓葳.完善行业协会内部治理结构的探讨[J].中国行政管理,2009(7):70-72.
[19]左奕.湘潭市行业协会内部治理存在的问题及对策研究[D].湘潭:湘潭大学,2017.
[20]张春良.体育纠纷救济法治化方案论纲[J].体育科学,2011,31(1):19-28,55.
基本信息:
DOI:10.13297/j.cnki.issn1005-0000.2020.02.011
中图分类号:G843
引用信息:
[1]王志文,张瑞林.全国性单项体育协会脱钩后内部治理的完善——基于中国足协的实证考察[J].天津体育学院学报,2020,35(02):195-201.DOI:10.13297/j.cnki.issn1005-0000.2020.02.011.